Control of the Internet
in the Modern Age
Parker Bennett
Consent of the
Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom
By Rebecca MacKinnon
Basic Books, 320 pp., $26.99
January 25, 2011: Hossam el-Hamalawy joins thousands
of others to take to the streets in Egypt as their “Day of Rage” begins.
Organizing protests through social media sites like Facebook and Twitter,
activists are able to put together highly visible and effective demonstrations
that elicit a response from the police. Soon protests are happening nation-wide
as Egypt experiences a modern revolution, attracting international attention.
On the third day of protests, Internet and phone services are cut off in the
Cairo area, severely disrupting communication between activists. This is only
part of the Egyptian government’s control over the citizens. Late Friday night,
Hossam el-Hamalawy along with numerous other protestors storm the offices of
the SSI in Nasr City. He visits the cell where he had been imprisoned for
anti-government sentiments and beaten, later writing on his Twitter feed that
he could not stop crying. Also discovered in the compound are thousands of
documents and files on citizens, with text message transcripts, Internet
postings, photos, dossiers, and other privacy-infringing records of Egyptian
citizens. As the regime built around Hosni Mubarak (the dictatorial president
of Egypt at the time) crumbles in the following weeks, more and more evidence comes
to light of the extent of which the Egyptian government kept surveillance on
its citizens, as well as the extent of how far it went to control their access
to freedom: The Internet.
The
Internet has become the most important innovation of the modern age, connecting
billions of users across the world, encouraging cooperation between people on a
global scale and allowing for the sharing of ideas, photos, information,
videos, and more. Even though it can create an open and free society, it can
also help those who wish to force control on people, or monitor them. This dual
use of the Internet is discussed in length in Rebecca MacKinnon’s book, The Consent of the Networked. As well as
discussing the role of the Internet in repressive governments and its role in
fighting for freedom, MacKinnon focuses on threats to the Internet, which
include authoritarian regimes, but also corporations and legislature which can
interfere with free speech and privacy rights. These areas of focus are the key points
Mackinnon uses in her book to prove her point that action needs to be taken in
regards to the Internet and freedom of speech/privacy concerns. As she says in
the beginning of the book,
It is time to stop debating whether the Internet is an effective
tool for political expression, and to move on to the much more urgent question
of how digital technology can be structured, governed, and used to maximize the
good it can do in the world, and minimize the evil….
The reality is that the corporations and governments that build,
operate, and govern cyberspace are not being held sufficiently accountable for
their exercise of power over the lives and identities of people who use digital
networks. They are sovereigns operating without the consent of the networked.
(MacKinnon, pp. 34 )
No comments:
Post a Comment